billso.com

The Honolulu Advertsier reports that after two months and US$50,000 in review expenses, the Honolulu Marathon has posted the 9 December 2007 race results.

Only 1798 Honolulu Marathon runners received accurate times on race day because SAI’s electronic timing system failed. These Advertiser articles from 12 December and 14 December describe the early efforts to identify and resolve the issues, as denial turned to grudging acknowledgment of an unprecedented failure.

A total of 22839 finishers were recorded and confirmed. Organizers used video and image files recorded by third-party vendors, spending an average of four hours to analyze each minute of video.

So when Ryan Lamppa of Running USA, says “They didn’t have to do it, but to their credit, they did,” he’s missing the point. Accurate timing is a key success factor in road races. Every road race that uses electronic timing can report the overall and group winners within a few minutes of their finish. Some participants need their results to qualify for other races, including the Boston Marathon. After running or walking for several hours, most participants want their timing results.

Early in 2007, Honolulu Marathon organizers decided to replace the ChampionChip system that was used for seven years with a paper-based RFID system. Like the Great Aloha Run, the Honolulu Marathon had been renting plastic RFID tags and recording equipment. Dozens of volunteers stoop down and clip the chips from runners shoes after the finish line, so the marathon could get its deposit back.

I’ve been involved in distance running for over 30 years. As far as I know, Hawaii is the only place in the US that uses a comprehensive chip rental system in its races. I’ve got my own ChampionChip, but I’ve never been able to use it in this state because of this rental policy. I stopped running marathons in 2001, but I run shorter, slower races during the year. I’ve obscured the serial number on the top portion of the chip.

Here is a picture of a ChampionChip, courtesy of McBadger. The chip has been opened to reveal a small RFID transmitter. There’s no battery, because the transmitter grabs power when the runner passes over a charged timing mat.

Honolulu Marathon organizers chose SAI’s paper-based RFID system for the 2007 race to save money, time and manpower. Runners could keep their SAI paper tag after the race as a souvenir. No retrieval or rental fees were needed. Additional RFID readers could be deployed on the race course to record split times. A large-scale test of the new timing system before the race would have been a good idea, though.

Ingredients for failure

The Honolulu Marathon failed to test or implement the paper-based system properly, and were unprepared for thousands of finish line questions regarding the results. Some runners found the chip time posted on the bulletin boards in the finish area did not match their own stopwatches. Soon, the bad news spread throughout Kapiolani Park.

1. Poorly trained race volunteers told runners that the RFID tags could be folded or kept on their race number. Turns out the SAI paper tags were so fragile that even one fold may break the tag, and printed instructions were provided on the race number.
2. The tags must be detached from the race number or bib, and placed on the runner’s shoe, so that the RFID sensors on the road can find the tag signal. Many runners left the tags on their number. I wonder if the instructions were printed in English only, and not in Japanese?
3. The electric generators that powered the RFID timing system on the race course flooded and failed in heavy pre-dawn rain. The RFID readers deployed on the race course were not weather-proofed, according to FinalSprint.

Coach Joe English reported last December that other races did not encounter problems with SAI’s paper RFID tags, but the Houston Marathon canceled its 2008 SAI contract when Honolulu’s problems emerged. However, I’ve seen posts on some running web forums that indicate there were SAI-related timing issues in the 2007 Las Vegas and Philadelphia marathons.

Organizers are hoping that Japanese runners, who are a large part of the annual event, will participate in the 2008 race. ChampionChips will be used, and the Honolulu marathon may sue SAI to recover costs. Perhaps all they’ll worry about in the 2008 edition are Race directors usually have other things to worry about headphone bans and baby strollers on the course. But the 2007 Honolulu Marathon will go down in road racing history as a lesson in race mismanagement.

The Honolulu Advertiser reported yesterday that Pacific LightNet has been sold to a group of mainland and local investors. Current president pat Bustamente is in the investment group. All 95 current employees will be retained.

The company had been controlled by a Japanese firm called Tomen. This prevented PLNI from bidding on many state and Federal contracts. LightNet will become a more competitive firm in the local telecom market.

PLNI has 25,000 business customers and over than 6,000 Internet subscribers in the state of Hawaii, and provides colocation, broadband Internet, VoIP, long distance calling and other services. According to the company’s web site, its telecommunication infrastructure in Hawaii includes over 10,000 miles of terrestrial and undersea fiber-optic cable connecting the six major islands.

The sale price was not disclosed in the 15 February 2008 filing with the Hawaii Public Utility Commission.

According to Reuters, Google CEO Eric Schmidt is discussing a possible expansion of his company’s facilities. Malaysia is the most likely location, as that country ranks number one in Google usage in Southeast Asia. The country is also close to Google’s existing offices in Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan.

Courtesy of BoingBoing, here’s a photo of at least five different electrical outlets that are available at each seat in a European conference room.

It’s not just the power outlets that are different. The outlets provide different voltages and frequencies of alternating current (AC), depending upon the standards. This Wikipedia article has a good discussion that I used to develop a key for the above photo. Going from left to right:

1. Type G or BS 1363: 240v, 50 hZ. Used in the UK, Singapore and South Africa
2. Type E: 220v, 50 hZ. Used in France, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, and other European countries.
3. I have no idea what standard the third plug uses.
4. Type J or SEV 1011: 250v, 50 hZ. A Swiss model.
5. Type B, NEMA, PBG: 120v, 60 hZ. The standard 3-pin plug used in the US and Canada. Japanese plugs look similar, but use 100v and 50 hZ.
6. Again, I have no clue which plug this might be.

Every couple of months, someone asks me about a power issue. It might be electric plugs, battery life or power adapters. International travelers sometimes learn a hard lesson about voltage. If an outlet supplies too little voltage, the device will not work well or at all. This is a common issue for European visitors to Hawaii, as our 120v outlets provide only half the power that a European device might need it.

If the outlet provides too much voltage, the device might start smoking or burning. American visitors to Europe sometimes encounter this issue when they force a 12ov Type B plug into a 220v or higher European outlet.

I’ve long thought that the standard USB type A connector might become a standard electrical connector for low-power devices. USB usually provides only 5v of direct current (DC) at 100 or 500 milliamperes. That’s either 1 or 2.5 watts, so USB only useful for charging or running small devices.

DC is the common standard for batteries, and is also used inside almost every electronic device. Batteries have a limited lifespan, even when recharged.

But USB is an international standard, so more and more digital cameras, mobile phones and small devices use this interface for charging. Better yet, perhaps some company will start offering USB power outlets that can be installed directly into a wall.

Wired ran an article a few days ago about pecha kucha, an art-house event that turns PowerPoint on its ear and makes presentations bearable.

The rules are simple:

1. 20 slides per presenter
2. 20 seconds maximum per slide
3. The presenter talks as the slides whiz across the screen.
4. No questions may be asked during the presentation.
5. When the show’s done, the presenter is done.
6. Next presenter, please.

I checked Pecha-Kucha.org to see if there were any events posted for Honolulu. After all, there have been pecha kucha events in over 80 cities around the world since 2003.

No luck.

Pecha kucha in Honolulu?

But this seems like a natural for First Fridays. Pecha kucha was first developed for architects and designers, to keep their pitches reasonable. A typical pecha kucha event has 14 slide shows in a single evening. That’s 280 slides.

There are reports of businesses who use pecha kucha as a presentation format for internal meetings. Perhaps this works better when no one else in the room is using a laptop. This article in the New York Times and this Microsoft web page discuss how Microsoft managers deal with laptops in meetings.

Personal computer use in a meeting can be helpful, but a computer is often a distraction, especially when they’re connected to the Internet. Mobile devices are almost as bad, too.

Now I’m wondering if pecha kucha is a useful tool for teaching. While the format doesn’t leave much time for questions, it does provide a quick pace.

Could pecha kucha help in the classroom?

Over the years, I’ve given student presenters rules that are similar to pecha kucha. I hadn’t made the connection until today, though. One common issue was that students tend to have problem with time limits and slide counts, possibly because this type of presentation format takes some practice to do well.

This format might be very useful for presentations given in online courses, though.