billso.com

Bill Sodeman writes about management, mobile computing and information systems

billso.com header image 4

City council members discuss mass transit research

all

Posted Tuesday, 15 April 2008

Read 1 comment

Sunday’s Honolulu Star-Bulletin features an investigation of the Honolulu City Council’s travel expenses for the mass transit project.

Council member Todd Apo had an interesting quote:

We’re making a huge decision… If people have not made the effort to get themselves fully educated, then I’d be concerned.”

Perhaps Apo was referring to fellow council members Charles Djou and Barbara Marshall. Both Djou and Marshall have argued against the project.

Marshall hasn’t spent a dime on travel related to the proposed project. Is it possible that she hasn’t been on one single trip to study transit systems in other cities?

Thrifty or shifty?

Djou has made several trips but has only charged the city US$26. He paid for his own travel:

It’s a very expensive project and I’m trying to be careful with taxpayer dollars… These transit trips paid for by the taxpayer and by the transit manufacturers are nothing more than junkets.”

It helps to keep an open mind about these trips. Vendors do want to fund these trips, but that does not mean that council members would be swayed towards their bids.

Yes, the travel expenses could have been used to fill potholes. But common sense dictates that our council members should be studying existing systems that resemble the current proposal. Isn’t that the Council’s job?

Djou recently declared his candidacy for Neil Abercrombie’s congressional seat - in the 2010 election. If Abercrombie needs to go, why doesn’t Djou run now, in 2008? Djou has been plotting this run since 2006. He ran unopposed for reelection, but he still ran political advertisements telling voters to “[r]emember the name, Charles Djou”.

Djou and Marshall need to stop voting “no”, as they risk joining former council member Rene Mansho on Honolulu’s transit hall of shame.

Where the rubber meets the road

Honolulu needs mass transit solutions now. Our city has tried and failed to select a comprehensive fixed guideway solution twice before. In today’s Star-Bulletin, council member Romy Cachola states he may support fixed guideway buses instead of steel-on-steel rail. He also wants construction to start with a segment from Aloha Stadium to downtown, via Salt Lake Boulevard. That’s through his district.

Cachola used his swing vote last year to get the system rerouted away from Honolulu International Airport and through his district. For many taxpayers, this move made no sense. The proposed mass transit system would help tourists and residents get to and from the airport, and avoid high parking fees. Any reasonable proposal that gets more rental cars of the road would be welcome on Oahu.

Cachola is also ranked number 2 among council members in terms of their travel spending for the proposed project. Romy’s op-ed piece this morning is another veiled threat that he may vote “no”, because he is placing his district’s needs ahead of the island’s.

Related posts on billso.com

Tags: authority, government, Hawaii, Honolulu, mass-transit, Oahu, research, USA

Can Apple stop the Open Computer?

ism

Posted Tuesday, 15 April 2008

Read 4 comments

15 April is tax deadline day in the United States. Next month, many US taxpayers will get a rebate check that President Bush hopes they will spend to boost the flagging economy.

Why not spend that check on a new computer? According to Good Morning Silicon Valley, Psystar will sell you an Open Computer. It’s an Intel PC that ships with an ugly case, a fresh copy of Mac OS X Leopard and a few software drivers generated by the open source osx86 project.

Why pay Apple’s hardware prices when an Intel PC can run the Mac operating system? It’s easy to build your own Mac-compatible Intel PC, and use the open source software and a copy of Leopard. In fact, this is a fine project for a student who has the resources and time… as long as they do not sell the final product.

Wired has pointed out one small problem with Psystar’s plan: Apple’s user license for Leopard specifically states that the operating system can only be used on Apple-branded hardware. Psystar cannot really sell a Mac operating system with a beige-box computer.

Perhaps this is why Psystar changed the product’s name yesterday. It was listed as “OpenMac”. The Mac name is trademarked by Apple, of course.

MacRumors has more information for those who are interested.

I sense a cease-and-desist order coming from 1 Infinite Loop in Cupertino, California.

Related posts and pages on billso.com

Tags: Apple, copyright, economy, hardware, mac, open-source, software, trademark, USA