<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shareholders may bring Microsoft and Yahoo together</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/</link>
	<description>Bill Sodeman writes about management, mobile computing and information systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: billso</title>
		<link>http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>billso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>John Markoff is spot on with his comments in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/technology/18integrate.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;yesterday&#039;s New York Times&lt;/a&gt;. Integrating Yahoo into Microsoft&#039;s operations is a difficult challenge.

Markoff cites one of my favorite examples: Microsoft&#039;s 1997 purchase of Hotmail. It took &lt;strong&gt;3.5 years&lt;/strong&gt; to convert Hotmail servers from UNIX to Windows!

Microsoft has little choice but to &quot;eat its own dog food&quot;. Industry insiders expect Microsoft to use its own web sites to demonstrate the scalability, reliability and features of Windows server software.

Yahoo uses FreeBSD, a version of UNIX, as its primary server OS, along with Java and PHP as programming languages.

It would take an enormous effort by Microsoft to port Yahoo to a Windows infrastructure. I agree with Markoff: Yahoo&#039;s developers and programmers might cooperate if Jerry Yang blessed Microsoft&#039;s takeover. 

If it&#039;s a hostile takeover, forget it. Yahoo will bleed OSS and UNIX talent. Those employees will leave Yahoo before they cooperate with the &quot;enemy&quot;: Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Markoff is spot on with his comments in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/technology/18integrate.html" rel="nofollow">yesterday’s New York Times</a>. Integrating Yahoo into Microsoft’s operations is a difficult challenge.</p>
<p>Markoff cites one of my favorite examples: Microsoft’s 1997 purchase of Hotmail. It took <strong>3.5 years</strong> to convert Hotmail servers from UNIX to Windows!</p>
<p>Microsoft has little choice but to “eat its own dog food”. Industry insiders expect Microsoft to use its own web sites to demonstrate the scalability, reliability and features of Windows server software.</p>
<p>Yahoo uses FreeBSD, a version of UNIX, as its primary server OS, along with Java and PHP as programming languages.</p>
<p>It would take an enormous effort by Microsoft to port Yahoo to a Windows infrastructure. I agree with Markoff: Yahoo’s developers and programmers might cooperate if Jerry Yang blessed Microsoft’s takeover. </p>
<p>If it’s a hostile takeover, forget it. Yahoo will bleed OSS and UNIX talent. Those employees will leave Yahoo before they cooperate with the “enemy”: Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billso</title>
		<link>http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>billso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>From The Register, here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/07/freeformdynamics_saas_reality_check/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an article&lt;/a&gt; about SaaS marketing. Sure, it&#039;s a web-based application, but that doesn&#039;t mean its good, cheap or reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From The Register, here’s <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/07/freeformdynamics_saas_reality_check/" rel="nofollow">an article</a> about SaaS marketing. Sure, it’s a web-based application, but that doesn’t mean its good, cheap or reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billso</title>
		<link>http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>billso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>By the way, SaaS is &quot;software as a service&quot;. Webmail, online word processors, ERP packages...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, SaaS is “software as a service”. Webmail, online word processors, ERP packages…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billso</title>
		<link>http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator>billso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/#comment-1059</guid>
		<description>Yahoo gets folded into MySpace? That makes even less sense than anything I&#039;ve read about the Microsoft-Yahoo debacle. 

Still, it could happen. MySpace hasn&#039;t been the advertising giant that News Corp envisioned. If Yahoo knows anything, it&#039;s advertising.

Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/feb/18/yahoo.yahootakeover&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an article from today&#039;s Guardian&lt;/a&gt;. Rupert Murdoch has little to lose by courting Yahoo.

Last June, there were &lt;a href=&quot;http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article1957867.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; reports&lt;/a&gt; that News Corp wanted to give MySpace to Yahoo, in return for a 30% stake in Yahoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo gets folded into MySpace? That makes even less sense than anything I’ve read about the Microsoft-Yahoo debacle. </p>
<p>Still, it could happen. MySpace hasn’t been the advertising giant that News Corp envisioned. If Yahoo knows anything, it’s advertising.</p>
<p>Here’s <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/feb/18/yahoo.yahootakeover" rel="nofollow">an article from today’s Guardian</a>. Rupert Murdoch has little to lose by courting Yahoo.</p>
<p>Last June, there were <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article1957867.ece" rel="nofollow"> reports</a> that News Corp wanted to give MySpace to Yahoo, in return for a 30% stake in Yahoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atypicalliving</title>
		<link>http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1058</link>
		<dc:creator>atypicalliving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/#comment-1058</guid>
		<description>Also, word is that in the News Corp. deal that Yahoo will be folded into the MySpace franchise.

If there&#039;s anything that I need to avoid, it&#039;s the prospect of &quot;mY!space.&quot;

The logical collaboration would be AOL/Yahoo, because the combined web presence of both could rival the ubiquitous G.  I do have to say though, unless they come up with a SaaS web program as savvy as the gMail/google docs/gCal EVERYONE is dead in the water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, word is that in the News Corp. deal that Yahoo will be folded into the MySpace franchise.</p>
<p>If there’s anything that I need to avoid, it’s the prospect of “mY!space.”</p>
<p>The logical collaboration would be AOL/Yahoo, because the combined web presence of both could rival the ubiquitous G.  I do have to say though, unless they come up with a SaaS web program as savvy as the gMail/google docs/gCal EVERYONE is dead in the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billso</title>
		<link>http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>billso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billso.com/2008/02/17/shareholders-microsoft-yahoo/#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>From Business Week comes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/feb2008/tc20080216_222836.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt;, which adds more weight to my final prediction. Microsoft might find a hostile takeover fight is cheaper than a higher bid for Yahoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Business Week comes <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/feb2008/tc20080216_222836.htm" rel="nofollow">this article</a>, which adds more weight to my final prediction. Microsoft might find a hostile takeover fight is cheaper than a higher bid for Yahoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

