Authority and convenience

by billso on Sunday, 27 January 2008

Cour­tesy of the Chron­i­cle of Higher Edu­ca­tion, I found links to two arti­cles in the Times of Lon­don. In the first arti­cle, Pro­fes­sor Tara Brar­bazon describes the research pol­icy for her first-year stu­dents: no Googling or Wikipedia. Stu­dents should con­sider the author­ity of the source mate­r­ial, instead of PageR­ank or con­ve­nience. In a response, Times colum­nist Mag­nus Lin­klater por­trays Brabazon’s ban as a short-sighted elit­ist, while prais­ing Wikipedia for its low error rate. Wikipedia has announced that it will con­duct a sur­vey of its users and edi­tors, with the assis­tance of the United Nations Uni­ver­sity and Maas­tricht University.

Of course, bal­ance is impor­tant, as I men­tioned in my 15 Jan­u­ary 2008 arti­cle about Wikipedia’s sev­enth anniver­sary. Wikipedia and Google are con­ve­nient start­ing points for research, but stu­dents need to develop their own search skills.

More library data­bases are avail­able in sur­pris­ing ways. This Chron­i­cle arti­cle from 7 Jan­u­ary 2008 dis­cusses how uni­ver­sity libraries are post­ing their own Face­book appli­ca­tions, to pro­vide their stu­dents with eas­ier access to ref­er­ence materials.

Share

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: