Scoring vs building

by billso on Thursday, 12 April 2007

Today I read an arti­cle by Dr. Wal­ter R. Tschinkel of Florida State Uni­ver­sity. He noted that while grades aren’t like sports scores, some stu­dents treat their aca­d­e­mic marks as points to be col­lected and tallied.

The TurnItIn.com grade­book does a nice job of dis­play­ing a student’s grade, based upon the assign­ments that have been sub­mit­ted. But at this point in the term, there are always some stu­dents who look at their scores and ask me what they “need” on their remain­ing assign­ments to “get” a cer­tain final grade. Usu­ally that final grade is a B, because their stu­dent fund­ing depends upon main­tain­ing a spe­cific GPA.

Stu­dents don’t “get” grades. Grades are earned. Part of my job as an instruc­tor is to set up assign­ments that help me mea­sure a student’s mas­tery and under­stand­ing of course con­cepts.
There were some courses I took as a stu­dent in which I learned a lot, but my final grade wasn’t very good. Grades are just one out­come of a grad­u­ate edu­ca­tion.  As I men­tioned on April 3, grad­u­ate stu­dents must learn how to become life­long learn­ers in their field of study. The prac­tice of meta-learning takes time to mas­ter, and it’s more like build­ing a house than play­ing a game.

At the end of a game, all we are left with are num­bers. After grad­u­a­tion, the grad­u­ate stu­dent should have built a solid foun­da­tion of knowl­edge that can only be cre­ated through their efforts, day by day, brick by brick.
Tschinkel has replaced mul­ti­ple choice exams with essays. I’ve used this method for the last few terms. While essays take more time to grade than a mul­ti­ple choice exam, it takes almost a lot of time to write and val­i­date good mul­ti­ple choice ques­tions. I have my own doubts about the util­ity of mul­ti­ple choice exams, espe­cially in online courses. How­ever, I have few doubts that man­agers and pro­fes­sional need the abil­ity to use, dis­cuss and write about infor­ma­tion sys­tems.
Like Tschinkel, I some­times ask sim­i­lar ques­tions through­out the term. That’s another way to gauge progress and under­stand­ing. It’s a not-so-subtle method of get­ting across the key points I need to make in a course, too. To quote an old Latin proverb, rep­e­ti­tion is the mother of learning.

Stu­dents who have kept up with my blog this term have found that I tend to focus on spe­cific issues. The tag cloud on my blog home page is one attempt at dis­play­ing this rep­e­ti­tion. It’s hasn’t worked as well as I’d hoped, partly because I’ve got so many tags or cat­e­gories in this blog. But it’s a start.

One other point that Tschinkel made is cov­ered in the final paper assign­ment of my courses this term. The reflec­tion paper gives stu­dents an oppor­tu­nity to assess their per­for­mance before the final exam. It’s a moti­va­tional tool. Instruc­tors can’t force stu­dents to read a blog entry or buy a text­book. That’s almost as hard as mak­ing some­one learn. When peo­ple learn with enthu­si­asm, it’s because they see value in the con­tent and the experience.

Share

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: