More thoughts on cheating, copyright and paraphrasing

by billso on Wednesday, 24 January 2007

I’ve been think­ing about the Boing Boing arti­cle that I posted yes­ter­day at http://billso.com/2007/01/23/ets-cheating/

I used to run an infor­ma­tion tech­nol­ogy cer­ti­fi­ca­tion exam pro­gram when I lived in Austin. We used VUE and Pro­met­ric to deliver our exams all over the world. The pro­gram still exists, even though it’s been through a few own­er­ship and man­age­ment changes. The lat­est incar­ni­a­tion is avial­able at http://ciwcertified.com

I’ve got no prob­lems with ETS’ terms of ser­vice. It’s their copy­righted exam, and ETS has worked with the test­ing cen­ters to set the rules of engagement.

No one’s forc­ing this anony­mous cow­ard to take a GRE exam and go to grad school.

One rea­son our uni­ver­sity sub­scribes to TurnItIn.com is that ser­vice helps pro­tect our stu­dents’ intel­lec­tual property.

We do have prob­lems with aca­d­e­mic dis­hon­esty, and some­times it’s hard to deter­mine if a stu­dent doesn’t know how to para­phrase or cite cor­rectly. I’ve seen stu­dents change a word or two in a multi-sentence pas­sage, with­out quo­ta­tion marks or an in-text cita­tion. TurnItIn.com almost always catches these unat­trib­uted quo­ta­tions, and the orig­i­nal­ity report pro­vides me with links to the orig­i­nal work.

Our stu­dents are enthu­si­atic Googlers, but it’s clear that some of them haven’t Googled “how to para­pha­rase” and found good links like these:

This last link is a guide from our uni­ver­sity library that is a good dis­cus­sion, even if it was writ­ten in 1995.

I’ll update my APA and ref­er­ence pages later this month to include some new links about these issues.

Share

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: