Clear Channel, KSSK cited for late response

by billso on Tuesday, 17 October 2006

This arti­cle first appeared on my old blog at http://www.bloglines.com/blog/wsodeman?id=193

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061017/NEWS01/610170340/1001

One dis­ap­point­ment on Sun­day morn­ing was Clear Channel’s slow response imme­di­ately after the earhquake. KSSK (590 AM, 92.3 FM) is the offi­cially des­ig­nated radio sta­tion for civil defense emer­gen­cies, so the sta­tion has emer­gency power gen­er­a­tors that did keep the trans­mit­ter running.

But all lis­ten­ers heard until 8 am was a pre­re­corded com­mu­nity affairs program.

Civil Defense Vice Direc­tor Ed Teix­eira did acknowl­edge that there was pub­lic con­cern over a pos­si­ble tsunami. How­ever, offi­cials had quickly deter­mined that there was no tsunami threat, and it was bet­ter not to announce that than to risk a gen­eral panic.

It’s always pos­si­ble that lis­ten­ers will not under­stand an announce­ment, and believe that a tsunami is com­ing when the broad­cast actu­ally said that it wasn’t.

Sev­eral peo­ple called KSSK Sun­day morn­ing to ask if a tsunami was com­ing. It was amus­ing to hear callers ask­ing these ques­tions sev­eral hours after the earth­quake, as a tsunami would have struck Oahu as soon as 27 min­utes after the most pow­er­ful quakes occurred on the big island. Again, I won­der if any­one pays atten­tion in their sci­ence courses.

As it was, the quakes were not pow­er­ful enough to gen­er­ate a tsunami. Appar­ently a 6.9 or greater mag­ni­tude is required.

If a tsunami alert were issued, an auto­matic announce­ment would have cut into the KSSK broad­cast. Also, the city’s sirens would have sounded.

Share

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: