Post 1547

by billso on Sunday, 29 August 2004

USA: The New York Times has pro­posed abol­ish­ing the Elec­toral Col­lege. In the Elec­toral Col­lege, every vote is not equal. Small states like it that way, so I doubt that small state leg­is­la­tures will vote for the con­si­tu­tional amend­ment required to make this change. Pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates would pay more atten­tion to the needs of the larger states like New York and Cal­i­for­nia, at the expense of smaller states like Hawaii and Nevada. Swing states would be a thing of the past. As the Times points out, Yucca Flats is get­ting more atten­tion than NYC secu­rity in this campaign.

Abol­ish­ing the Elec­toral Col­lege could encour­age more vot­ers to par­tic­i­pate in pres­i­den­tial elec­tions, if vot­ers know that their vote directly counts towards the total results, and that votes will be accu­rately tab­u­lated. I lived in Texas in 2000, so my vote against W was for naught.

Share

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: